近期的日本國學研究再探──從「國民國家論」的理解角度視之

How is ＂national theory＂ discussed? From the viewpoint of the study of Kokugaku in recent years

近年來，在日本歷史學會就如何把戰後歷史學定位成現代歷史學開展了議論。這些議論之所以會發生，是因為歷史學的研究方法論在過去30年之間發生了巨大變化，且歷史學的研究環境也發生了很大的變化。這也可能是由於負責「戰後歷史學」的歷史學家相繼過世以及世代交替的進展。本文透過檢視國學研究史，探討如何理解「國民國家論」的問題。近年來，有人認為90年代以前的日本國學研究被「國民国家」所吸收。本論文將對其妥適性進行探究，亦將其作為未來史學史研究的起出發點。

In recent years, discussions have been held in Historical Society in Japan on how to position the formation from postwar history to modern history. The reason for these discussions is that the methodology of history has changed a lot in the last 30 years, and the environment surrounding history has changed greatly. Another reason may be the death historians carrying ＂postwar history＂ and the ongoing generational shift.In this paper, I would like to examine how ＂national theory＂ is understood through the study of the history of Japanese classical literature. In recent years, there has been an opinion that the study of Japanese classical literature before the 1990s was absorbed into the ＂nation-state＂ We would like to examine its validity. I would like to make it a starting point for future historical research.