英文摘要 |
As the name indicates, concessive conditionals share certain functional properties with both concessives and conditionals. They can be categorized into three types: (1) scalar, (2) alternative, and (3) universal concessive conditionals (Haspelmath and Knöig 1998). Chinese scalar concessive conditionals are usually marked by jishi, jibian, zongran, zongshi, jinguan, guran, or jiusuan ''even though'', while alternative and universal concessive conditionals are introduced by wulun, bulun, or buguan ''no matter who/where/how''. Based on Construction Grammar (Goldberg 1995, 2006), this study aimed to investigate the textual characteristics of the three types of Chinese concessive conditionals (i.e. scalar, alternative and universal concessive conditionals) in their collocations and discourse structures. The data came from UDNDATA, a newspaper database of the United Daily News group. The results show that Chinese scalar concessive conditionals marked by jinguan, guran, jiushuan, jishi, jibian, zongshi and zongran, convey two types of meanings. When they denote a real situation, which often co-occur with the contrastive markers such as dan(shi) to express contrast, they are similar to suiran ''though/although'', especially jinguan and guran. When they describe a possible situation, they are similar to conditionals. On the other hand, the alternative and universal concessive conditionals marked by buguan/bulun/wulun often co-occur with dou ''all''. The data indicate that there are two common patterns of Chinese scalar concessive conditionals in written discourse: X-X’-Y and X-Y-X’ and that the most common pattern of the alternative and universal concessive conditionals is X-Y-X’. The main functions the concessive conditionals perform in discourse are elaborating the preceding discourse, making transition, and concluding the previous text.
|