簡版社交技巧提升系統青少年評量表的信度與效度研究

Reliability and Validity of the Short-form Chinese-version Social Skills Improvement System Rating Scales for Adolescent Students

本研究主要目的在檢驗簡版社交技巧提升系統青少年學生評量表的信度與效度，該評量表包含社交技巧測驗與行為問題兩項測驗，共40道問題。研究樣本為1031名七年級至十二年級學生（男生515人，女生516人，平均年齡為15.58歲，標準差1.75歲），以青少年社會行為評量表學生版為研究工具，使用AMOS 20.0統計軟體進行驗證性因素分析。研究結果顯示本研究簡版量表具有信度與效度，在信度方面，社交技巧各分測驗的α值介於.74至.84，重測信度則介於.67至.85；行為問題各分測驗的α值介於.70至.74，重測信度則介於.70至.76；驗證性因素分析結果顯示假設模式有良好的適配度，意謂社交技巧測驗與行為問題測驗的理論架構受到實證資料的支持；此外，社交技巧測驗得分與青少年社會行為評量表的適應性行為測驗得分有顯著正相關，行為問題測驗得分與青少年社會行為評量表的不適應行為測驗得分也有顯著正相關；比較簡版和原版在高風險學生分類的結果，兩者間的一致性也很高。

This study examined the reliability and validity of the short-form Chinese version of the Social Skills Improvement System-Rating Scales (SSIS-RS) for adolescent students; SSIS-RS comprises two scales, each assessing social skills and problem behaviors. The research sample consisted of 1031 grade 7-12 students [515 boys and 516 girls; mean (standard deviation) age = 15.58 (1.75) years]. The Adolescent Social Behavior Scale Student Form was also applied; moreover, AMOS (version 20.0) was used for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability values were respectively .74- .84 and .67- .85 for the social skill subscales and .70- .74 and .70- .76 for the problem behavior subscales. The CFA results revealed that the theoretical models presented good model fit, suggesting that the empirical data supported the hypothesized theoretical frameworks of the social skill and problem behavior scales. The social skills and problem behavior scale scores strongly correlated with the scores of the adaptive and maladaptive behavior scales of the Adolescent Social Behavior Scale Student Form, respectively. Moreover, the observed classification consistency was high between the original and the short-form version of the Chinese SSIS-RS for the current adolescent students. Taken together, the current results demonstrate good reliability and validity of the short-form Chinese version of SSIS-RS in adolescent students.