西太平洋地區樞紐港埠選擇成本比較分析－－ACS模式之應用

Comparative Analyses of Costs among Hub Ports Selection in West-Pacific Rim : Application of ACS Model

西太平洋地區為全球定期航運市場競爭最激烈區域，各大樞紐港埠問航線配置已成為航商誓運最具決策性的選擇要頃，此點對本區域內各國家之港埠長遠發展，具有極為關鍵之影響。本文即據此為研究動機，探求航商進行航線配置與轉運時，在各樞紐港埠之成本優勢與適當之船型配置，並對著運變數進行敏風度分析。本文鋒、採平均成本節省模式為研究方法，此模式曾被利用在相關港埠競爭研究文獻中，頗具可行性與有效性。研究結果顯示:韓國登山港、中國大陸之上海港、香港;以及東南亞之新加坡港，分別為東北亞、東亞與東南亞地區中，最具競爭優勢的樞紐港埠，在不同貨源、分佈區域之比較上，航商據之為主航線樞紐港埠可相對地節省其運輸成本。

The West Pacific Rim is the most competitive area around the worldfor the liner market. Every container ocean carrier always concerns the decisions of routes deployment among the hub ports in this area, and the competitive situation would affect the future development of each ports. This article would base above motives and expect to solve the problems of cost-saving for container carriers to comparison among different container hub ports and routes deployment, especially on the ship-type deployment and sensitivity analysis of variability. The average cost-soving (ACS Model) method is employed in this article, it has been applied in literatures to analyze the competitions among hub ports, and shown that is feasible and effective. The result of article points out that container carriers could get cost saving advantage ifthey deployed the trunk routes and hub ports on Busan(Korea) in North-east Asia, Shanghai/Hong Kong(PRC) in East Asia, and Singapore in South-east Asia.