試論清代楚辭學之詮釋典範──以王夫之《楚辭通釋》、戴震《屈原賦注》為對象

Two Interpretation Paradigms of Chu Ci Studies in Qing Dynasty : The Exgesis of Wang Fu Zhi's The General Studies in Chu Ci and Dai Zhen's The interpretation of Qu Yuan's Fu as the research objects

本文選擇清代《楚辭》學名家：王夫之與戴震，藉由「詮釋模式」理論，剖析《楚辭通釋》與《屈原賦注》在深層詮釋脈絡上的差異。在「詮釋目的與態度」方面，確認王氏以「言志達情」為目的，採「相對主觀」態度進行詮釋；而戴氏則以「發掘屈原《楚辭》之至純」為目的，採「相對客觀」詮釋。在「真理本質與文本型態觀」方面，王氏秉持「詩道性情」之原則，視《楚辭》為屈原與個人宣發合乎天理之真情，並重視其情與景之相生關係；而戴氏則重視「聖人之道」的探求，視屈原《楚辭》為「聖人原意」。在「詮釋原則與操作方法」方面，王氏採「意注結合」原則，發展出「本事求情」、「時事考證」、「章句安排」、「孤心相髣」與「玄言之旨」等方法；而戴氏則以「觸事廣類」為原則，發展出「參互考驗，博徵其材」、「約守其例，實事求是」等方法。

The study extends academic “Interpretation Model” and adopts Wang Fu Zhi's The General Studies in Chu Ci and Dai Zhen's The interpretation of Qu Yuan's Fu as comparison “interpretation paradigm”, based on six elements : “interpretation purpose” and “interpretation attitude”, “truth and essence” and “text style”, “interpretation principle” and “operational method”, it systematically reconstructs “interpretation model” of the said pradigms to apply it to modern Chinese traditional humanity research.