月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
中外法学 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
中國死刑民意:測量、解構與溝通
作者 梁根林
中文摘要
死刑存廢是一個以公眾認同為正當性與合法性基礎的公共政策選擇問題,死刑政策決策與死刑制度設計必須認真對待民意。基於三萬餘個樣本所做的實證分析顯示,雖然多數受訪者仍然支持保留死刑,報應和威懾是民眾主張保留死刑的兩大觀念支柱,但是,中國主流民意對死刑的認同已經發生了明顯鬆動,不再絕對認同死刑,絕大多數中國民眾已經無條件地支持或有條件地接受廢除死刑。一旦提供了恰當的死刑替代措施,近八成一般性地支持保留死刑的民眾轉而同意廢除死刑。死刑民意具有複雜的生成機理,自我實現、傳媒依賴、社會不公遭遇、安全感、法治意識和社會問題評價與死刑存廢態度顯著相關。應當運用溝通商談模式對死刑民意進行理性引導,促進人的全面發展與社會的文明和諧,發揮政治精英的關鍵少數作用,科學設計死刑替代措施,普及死刑知識,借助大眾傳媒平臺,與民眾進行溝通商談,為循序漸進地推進我國死刑改革奠定堅實的社會心理基礎。
英文摘要
The preservation or the abolition of death penalty is an issue of public policy choice justified by public recognition. Policy decisions and system designs of death penalty should take public opinions seriously. Using data from more than 30000 samples, this research finds that the concept of retribution and deterrence constitutes the most important conceptual foundation for death penalty, upon which the majority of Chinese people are in favor of preservation of death penalty. However, the mainstream view towards death penalty has significantly changed, which suggests that the majority of Chinese people are not absolute retentionists, but either unconditional or conditional abolitionists. When appropriate alternative measures to death penalty are posed, nearly eighty percent retentionists will turn into abolitionists. Public opinions of death penalty are influenced by a variety of factors including self-actualization, dependence of mass media, social unfair experiences, sense of security, legal awareness as well as evaluation of social problems. The discourse pattern is the most suitable pattern for China to lead public opinions towards a rational direction. According to this pattern, it is advisable to promote all-round development of human beings as well as civilization and harmony of the society, value the crucial role of political elites, establish appropriate alternative measures to death penalty and communicate with the public through mass media, so as to lay solid socio-psychological foundation for the gradual reform of death penalty in China.
起訖頁 1256-1282
關鍵詞 死刑民意外部測量內部解構民意引導溝通商談Public Opinions of Death PenaltyExternal MeasurementInternal AnalysisLeading Public OpinionsDiscourse Pattern
刊名 中外法学  
期數 202010 (191期)
出版單位 北京大學法學院
該期刊-上一篇 認罪認罰“從寬”裁量模式實證研究
該期刊-下一篇 商標使用行為法律構造的實質主義
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄