人工智慧技術在司法裁判中的運用及規制

人工智慧技術在司法裁判中被廣泛運用，但各國有不同的態度和做法，因其不僅存在技術困境，也可能帶來現實風險，包括衝擊公正價值、影響公民權利、削弱審判權獨佔原則和與法官獨立審判原則發生衝突等，需予規制。基於維護法的基本價值、保障公民基本權利、遵循司法裁判基本原理的立場，需妥善處理公正價值與效率價值、“工具理性”與人類福祉、開放理念與審慎態度、裁判方式創新與司法體制改革等四組關係。應當明確人工智慧技術的定位和適用範圍，加強對當事人訴訟權利的保障，適度分離司法裁判工作與人工智慧產業，調整法官考核評價機制，從而實現人工智慧技術在司法裁判中的規範運用。

While Artificial Intelligence(AI)technology has been widely applied in adjudication process, countries have different attitudes and practices. Because of AI technology has not only technical limits but also potential risks, including challenging the value of fairness, affecting civil rights, weakening the principle of exclusive jurisdiction, and conflicting with the principles of independent trial by judges, etc. , the application of AI technology in adjudication process needs to be regulated. Based on the grounds of maintaining basic values of the law, protecting the fundamental rights of citizens, and adhering to the principles of adjudication process, it is necessary to properly handle four groups of relations: fairness and efficiency, ''instrumental rationality'' and human welfare, open mind and prudent attitude, and innovation in adjudication methods and reform of judicial system. To achieve the legitimate application of AI technology in adjudication process, it is crucial to clarify the orientation and applicability scope of AI technology, strengthen the protection of litigation rights of the parties, appropriately separate the adjudication activities and the AI industry, and adjust the judge’s assessment and evaluation mechanism.