論互聯網“提供作品”行為的界定

互聯網“提供作品”行為的界定，是以普通連結作為出發點，類推適用資訊網路傳播權的法律解釋過程。“提供作品”行為界定的核心解釋問題是保證類推解釋的正當性及合理性。“提供作品”行為界定的具體結論，本質是界定著作權權利範圍。在著作權侵權裁判的實踐語境中，“提供作品”行為界定標準的正當性與合理性，籍由規範性目標在論證邏輯上的約束，及類比推理過程的妥當性加以實現。採取合目的性擴張解釋方式更加契合類推解釋的邏輯。互聯網“提供作品”行為界定的解釋方案，是由“實質呈現標準”來界定具體涉案行為是否構成“不法使用作品”行為，並輔以“合理使用”抗辯對具體結論的合理性加以調整。

Defining Making Work Available, is the legal interpretative process for analogically applying the right to communication through information network, which is based on this doctrine applied to the external link. The legitimacy and plausibility of the analogical interpretation is the core for defining Making Work Available, and its conclusion is essentially about the scope of copyrights. In copyright infringement decision-making, the legitimacy and plausibility come from the constraints of the normative goals and the proper reasoning process that leads to the interpretation of purposive expansion. The interpretation solution of defining Making Work Available is to clarify the action involved is the ''unlawful use of the work'' through ''substantial presenting test'', supplemented with Fair Use doctrine for reasonable application.