反不正當競爭法屬性的新定位

有關反不正當競爭法（反法）民法與經濟法（競爭法）屬性的定位，一直存在著明顯的結構性錯位與失衡。要最大程度保護競爭自由，就必須突破部門法思維的局限，將反法定位為正確的民法理念、技術支撐下的競爭法制度構造；以民事利益作為反法的基本法益，在利益侵害式侵權認定範式的基礎上，圍繞競爭秩序的保護，建立不正當性認定的標準和方法。就內在機理而言，反法將私法自治融入競爭秩序建構的內在邏輯，從根本上確立了兩種屬性的結構性關聯，使其成為二者“關聯交錯的場合”。當越來越多地強調抑制政府干預而擴大行為自由時，反法的侵權法色彩逐漸“隱去”，競爭法屬性日益“凸顯”。

Attributes of Anti-unfair Competition Law( ''AUCL'' )are obviously and structurally misplaced, including the attributes of Economic Law(or Competition Law)and those of Civil Law at the meantime. One often mechanically applies the paradigm of rights infringement on illegality identification in AUCL. This is nothing but holding a hollow name of AUCL through simply repeating the traditional thoughts of Civil Law, inducing the intervention to market competition and the immersion in vague moral debates. The key solution is to meet the demand protecting free competition to a much larger extent, to break the bonds that confines our thought to the approach of departmental law, and to build the AUCL with correct principle and method of Civil Law. Based on the theory of ''breaching law causes rights infringement'' and ''breaching custom causes rights infringement'' , the recognition system of illegality in AUCL will be constructed with setting the basic legal interest of AUCL as a civil interest. The aim is to protect the competition order and secure the independency of AUCL as a part of Competition Law, which also determines the route of illegality recognition that applies the no-distorted-competition standard to balancing diverse interests. AUCL then fills the gap leaved by and take the advantage of the autonomy of private law through protecting the competition order, which closely connects the attributes of AUCL and these of Civil Law together. The tort law elements in AUCL will fade away, when there are more and more emphases that inhibit the government s intervention and extend market freedom and the attributes of AUCL stand out.