論股權讓與的意思主義構成

公司法學界關於股權讓與構成的爭議，源於對股權性質的不同認識，以及未能正確理解股權讓與的制度功能。而在研究方法上，欠缺對實務操作尤其是股權讓與交易實務的關注，也是造成理論爭議的另一原因。在理清各層次的問題面向後，以意思主義來構造讓與當事人間的股權讓與要件，不僅契合其制度功能，符合股權屬性的法教義學推論，更能兼顧股權交易實務的特殊需求。至於股東名冊記載，僅是股權受讓人向公司主張並行使股權的要件，並非實證法上股權讓與的構成要件。

The controversy over the composition of share transfer in the field of corporate law stems from different understandings of the nature of share and the failure to correctly understand the institutional functions of share transfer. In terms of research methods, the lack of attention to practical operations, especially share transfer and transaction practices, is another cause of theoretical controversy. After clarifying the aspects of problems at all levels, the use of Consensual Principle to construct the requirements of share transfer between the parties is not only in line with its institutional functions, but also in line with the legal dogmatics of inference of the attribute of share. It therefore can better balance the special needs of share trading practices. As for the recording of shareholders, it is only the condition that the transferee claims and exercises the stock right to the company, but not the constituent condition of share transfer in positive law.