公司決議訴訟的功能定位與程式機制

公司決議訴訟根據功能可分為兩類：一類是股東之外的人員因自身權利受到公司決議的影響在擁有確認利益的前提下提起的請求確認公司決議不成立或無效的訴訟，其屬於普通的確認之訴，適用民事訴訟法的一般規範；另一類是股東提起的旨在客觀監督公司決議的不成立、無效或撤銷之訴（“共益型訴訟”），由於這類訴訟追求的訴訟目的相同，因此應當承認它們的訴訟請求實質相同，也即針對同一決議基於相同事實提起的決議不成立、無效和撤銷之訴，構成重複起訴。而且，為了進一步避免矛盾判決和促進判例統一，未來還應當承認共益型公司決議訴訟的判決既判力向全體股東發生擴張，並在專屬與集中管轄、合併審理、和解、仲裁等方面制定明確規範。

The litigations regarding company decisions can be classified into two types: (1)A person other than shareholders claims that a company decision shall be null and void because he/she is effected by the would-be invalid company decision. This type of litigation belongs to the common declaratory suits. (2)A shareholder suits against the company to nullify the company decision. This type of litigation serves the function of supervising the company decisions for the public interest. In the future, a litigation to nullify the company decision and a litigation to cancel the company decision should be treated in the same way because both have the common function. Additionally, in order to avoid inconsistent judgments, the res judicata of litigation regarding company decisions for the public interest should be extended to apply to all the shareholders.