監察法與刑法的銜接協調與規範運行

監察法的生效實施使其從靜態規範轉化為動態運行，在此過程中需要正視關聯性法律的銜接協調問題。監察委員會行使的職務犯罪調查作為後期訴訟程式推進的基礎，因其罪責追究的特定屬性而與刑法關係緊密。在監察物件的明確規定上，監察法調整職務違法與職務犯罪的一體性決定了其比刑法更為寬泛，但是在內涵上仍然延續了刑法對公職犯罪的實質要求。監察法未把單位主體納入監察範疇帶來了刑法適用上的空缺，單純程式補正無法遮蔽實體規定適用上的短板。監察委員會的性質定位決定了監察主體刑責追究在部分職務犯罪主體上的非對應性，權力邊界與刑法平等原則未能一體遵循，應當在恪守罪刑法定原則的基礎上通過立法解釋或者法律修訂予以彌補。監察委員會在行使職務犯罪調查權時，與刑罰適用中的時效制度、自首制度和認罪認罰從寬制度存在規範上的非一致性，由於難以排斥監察委員會調查行為與上述刑罰制度的價值契合，因而需要通過刑事實體法的調整來解決彼此之間的非協調性，從而保證監察法與刑法之間的銜接順暢和規範運行。

The implementation of the Supervision Law has been transformed it from static specification to dynamic operation. , during this process, it is necessary to face up to deal with the cohesion and coordination issues between relevant laws. The duty crime investigations carried out by the supervision committee are the basis for the promotion initiation of the subsequentlate litigation procedures, which is closely related to the criminal law because of the specific attributes of culpability. In the clear provisions of the supervision object, the Supervision Llaw adjusts duty violation and duty crime, which and the both haves a higher consistency, which determininges that it is broader than criminal law, but it still continues the substantive requirements of criminal law against public office crimes. The Supervision Law does not bring unit subject into the scope of supervision, causing vacancies in the application of criminal law, and the simple procedure remedy cannot cover the short board in the application of substantive provisions. The nature orientation of the supervision committee determines the non-correspondence between criminal accountability for the monitoring subject and partial duty crime subject. , The power boundary and the equality principle of the criminal law fail to get the corresponding compliance, so it should be compensated through legislative interpretation or legal amendment on the basis of abiding the principle of legally prescribed punishment. When the supervision committee conducts duty crime investigations, there exists non-conformity with prescription system, surrender system and the lenient system of pleading guilty and confessing punishment, because it is difficult to exclude the performance of the supervision committee from the value of the above-mentioned penalty system. , Therefore, it is necessary to solve the non-coordination between each other through the timely adjustment of the criminal substantive law in order, to ensure the rational convergence and standardized operation between the supervision law and the criminal law.