批判法律理論的譜系

不同於流行的“法律與文學”視角，從批判法律理論的角度重新審視法學界圍繞《秋菊打官司》電影展開的討論，能考察批判法律理論在中國的內在譜系。蘇力從“秋菊的困惑”入手，秉持法律多元主義理論和功能主義法治觀對主流的西方普適主義權利法治觀展開批判，從而希望建構一種吸納中國本土資源的法治。此後，對《秋菊打官司》的解讀形成兩個批判法律的理論高峰。一個是馮象從基督教理論和共產主義學說的左翼立場出發對法治實踐趨向於全球資本帝國“法治行省”的批判，另一個是趙曉力試圖從中國古典傳統的保守主義立場出發對現代法治將人的生命意義壓縮為資本-勞動力的批判。對此的研究一方面試圖提供一個思考改革開放四十年中國法理學發展的內在線索，另一方面也希望推動中國探索新的法治發展道路和構建理想的法治秩序。

Different from the popular perspective approach of ''law and literature'', this paper attempts to re-examine the legal studies scholarship on the film the Story of Qiuju from the perspective of critical legal studies, so asaiming to investigate the genealogy of critical legal studies in China. Professor Su Li is the first one to study this film and care about the ''confusion of Qiuju'' so as to criticize the mainstream western universalist view of the rule of law in China. He insisted advocated legal pluralism and legal functionalism to the rule of law, hoping to construct a new kind of the rule of law with ''local resources'' in China. Since then, the interpretation of the Story of Qiuju formed two theoretical peaks camps in criticizing mainstream western universalist view of the rule of law in China. One is professor Feng Xiang s criticism from the left-wing position of Christian theory and communist theory, in which he criticized legal transplantation in China as building aprovince of the global capitalist empire. The other is pProfessor Zhao Xiaoli s criticism from the conservative position of Chinese classical tradition. He criticized that the rule of western law in China has destroyeding the meaning of life and the way of living. On the one hand, this paper attempts to provide an internal clue for thinking about the development of legal theories in China in the past 40 years since the beginning of the age of reforming and opening upopening and reform; on the other hand, it also hopes attempts to promote China to explore a new development path of rule of law and build an ideal legal order with legal pluralism for China.