不干預原則的終結：中國對盧安達、烏干達與剛果政策之比較（2000-2014）

The End of Non-intervention: A Comparative Assessment of Chinese Activity in Rwanda, Uganda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo（2000-2014）

中國在外交政策對不干預原則行之有年，其與二戰後國際組織建制相似，為本篇所欲討論的其中一點。中國的不干預原則經常是爭議的來源，原因為，中國被批評藉由與獨裁政權及當地軍閥連結獲取經濟利益，而忽略被侵犯的政治與人權。同時這也是自1940 年代以來與多數國家建立重要關係的政策之一，且不能夠被視為與二戰結束後，確立的國際組織制度對國家主權認定有所區別。本文主要討論中國不干預原則的政策近似於自1945年以來國際組織制度所提倡的國家主權承認。除此之外，筆者認為我們必須再次檢視不干預原則本身的概念，當中國持續加重經濟領域的投資，儘管是以不同的方式進行，但卻使盧安達與DRC 產生政治和經濟形勢的轉變。本文探討中國在持續培育與該地區的統治政權的關係上，其利益是否也能夠隨著大湖區國家的政治而移轉。

China has a well-established history of non-intervention when it comes to its foreign policy, one that this paper argues is similar to that of the international organization regime that was established after World War II. China's non-intervention is often a source of criticism, suggesting it allows China to reap the economic benefits of doing business with autocratic regimes and local warlords while ignoring political and human rights abuses. At the same time, the policy is one that has established important relations with numerous governments since the 1940s and must not be considered as significantly different from recognition of state sovereignty that has defined the international organization regime since the end of World War II. This essay argues that China's non-intervention policy is similar to the recognition of national sovereignty promoted by the international organization regime since 1945. Further, I argue that we need to revisit the concept of non-intervention itself as China continues to invest heavily in economic sectors that are changing the political and economic landscape of Rwanda and the DRC, albeit in different ways. This essay explores whether or not Chinese interests will be able to remain removed from the politics of the Great Lakes countries as they continue to cultivate relations with the ruling regimes of the region.