評判反介入／區域拒止下的「海空戰」概念

「AirSea Battle」 under Anti-Access/Area Denial: A Critique

在解放軍發展反介入／區域拒止戰力的背景下，美國近期出現了「海空戰」作戰概念的倡議。此一作戰概念的內容堪稱完整而全面，也提出許多值得美軍採納的建議，但缺失也同樣明顯。其概念中的兩個作戰構想，深入中國大陸上空的空襲，與侵入第一島鏈之內的反潛作戰，都是執行困難且徒勞無功，更帶來沒有必要的升高風險，因而得不償失。其實，美國及其區域盟邦只要發展類似的反介入／區域拒止戰力，即可對解放軍可能的侵略與強制構成強大的抵抗力。

People's Liberation Army is developing its anti-access/area-denial capabilities to offset U.S. military presence in the West Pacific. In response, the operational concept of the 'AirSea Battle' is currently being put forward in the United States. However, useful recommendations notwithstanding, both of its two core ideas - deep strike over Chinese mainland and antisubmarine warfare within first island chain - are difficult, futile, and contenting unnecessary risks of escalation. In fact, the United States and its regional allies can develop their own anti-access/area-denial capabilities and thus constitute a powerful resistance against potential Chinese aggressions and coercions.