英文摘要 |
In this paper we analyze the game implications of Anti-Secession Law from the viewpoint of commitment strategy. We also try to modify the Chain-Store Game on cross-Strait relationship of Huang and Wang (2000) as a basis of our argument. We find Anti-Secession Law possesses two characteristics of the commitment strategy. One is to restrict the player's strategy sets, while the other is to change their payoffs. Various literatures in economics and political science discuss the role of commitment strategy in different games. This paper focuses not only on theoretical analyses but also on the linkage of researchers between economics and political science. |