英文摘要 |
In theory, there are four critical divided government issues in Taiwan's political development, including the control of the executive and legislative branches of county/city governments by different political parties, control of the central-government and county/city-government administration by different parties, the control of the county/city-government and township-level administration by different parties, and the Kuomintang (KMT) being unable to control the executive and legislative branches at the central level. As the phenomenon of divided government has played a significant role in various theories of public policy and political behavior, this pilot study extends the concept to horizontally and vertically divided government. Furthermore, this study concentrates on both the causes and consequences of divided and unified government. Concerning the causes of divided government, American researchers have developed distinct approaches to the study of split-ticket voting behavior. None have provided a comprehensive explanation, however. The question about the consequences of divided government-does policy gridlock arise under divided government? -also remains contentious. This essay judges how far these political scientists take us toward a theory that explicates the causes and consequences of divided government, and suggests possible approaches to Taiwan politics in future studies. In conclusion, I make some predictions about the plausible development of divided government in Taiwan. |