両岸和平交渉における政治上の困難と選択可能な代替案について

兩岸和平談判的政治困難與替案選擇（Difficulties in the Negotiations of the Cross-Straits Peace Agreement and Possible Alternatives）

「胡六點」提出了兩岸結束敵對狀態與進行和平談判要求。對於台灣而言，當前雙方對於國家主權認知與談判對價差距甚大，且民主化以後的台灣是很難接受一個從屬於中國「一國兩制」的非主權國家身分。北京方面的談判思維，就是意圖逐漸地以政治與法律約束力，框住台灣必須朝向與中國大陸進行國家統合的政治發展，達到所謂兩岸關係「不可逆轉的趨勢」（making the positive changes irreversible）。儘管如此，兩岸有關和平協議的政治談判，是必須將主權放在國際政治、國際法與憲法的具體內涵加以討論，對台灣才會有實質意義。面對即將到來兩岸政治談判的難局，中國大陸福建與台灣在「海西經濟區」的合作試驗，或是一條在雙方可以接受範圍之下，進行兩岸初階經濟與社會模式磨合的可行替代途徑。

The 'Six-Points' proposed by the PRC leader Hu Jintao stipulates the terms of easing cross-strait hostilities and encouraging peaceful negotiation. From Taiwan's perspective, the difference in interpretations between Beijing and Taipei on national sovereignty is irreconcilable. More importantly, a democratized Taiwan is not likely to accept a so-called 'One State, Two Systems' compromise. Thus far, Beijing's negotiation strategy is premised on restraining Taiwan's political and legal status internationally, thereby constraining Taiwan to a path destined for integration with mainland China. Such political developments would invariably reach a tipping point after which changes to the status-quo would be irreversible. However, when conducting political negotiations on a peace agreement it is vital to contextualize sovereignty within international politics as well as international legal and constitutional frameworks in order to produce meaningful results. In resolving the foreseeable cross-strait political gridlock, the experimentation in cooperation between the Chinese province of Fujian and Taiwan with a 'Heisey economic zone' may be an alternative approach for both sides to engage in an initial model for economic and social interactions.