英文摘要 |
The social enterprises of America and Europe have nothing in common with each other to define to society and economic indicator, but can find to promote social enterprise’s legal system or public policy from various countries, no matter Britain adopts the allocation proportion regulation of surpluses, or South Korea and Taiwan adopt surpluses and distribute the norms, all assign the surplus to regard as the key indicators of social enterprises. However, it has significant limitation that the surplus is distributed, and apt to become the commercial tool that disguised, for example operate through the financial affairs, the surplus can be reduced, even present book and suffer the loss, it appear and mere formality while exercising restraint in while assigning then surplus, or only last any at dipping in public service surplus, call oneself for social enterprise, quite apt to let social the intersection of enterprise and dirty name take. The intersection of base and this, this text and studies the science, explore from the domestic and foreign experience social enterprises distribute the limitation caused for key indicator with the surplus at first; Secondly, dispose two angles with the cost of ownership from social enterprise’s ownership, the ones that paid ownership are dialectical; Moreover, lock the foundation designed for ownership with the assets, carry on dynamics analysis; Finally, for prevent social enterprise from form another kind of unfair attitude, assign as to surplus distribution, taxation free or the prior procurement and supporting policy preferably, this text thinks that should all be inlaid in the structure that ownership assets lock, could agree with the mixed features of social enterprises so. |