互聯網不正當競爭案件裁判法研析

Research on the Judgment Method of Internet Unfair Competition Cases

掌握互聯網不正當競爭案件的裁判方法對於法官準確裁判不正當競爭精品案件以及案件當事人贏得訴訟至關重要。裁判互聯網不正當競爭案件實體問題應遵循「三部曲」法，即按照「查明原告是否享有權利（權益）、認定被告是否構成侵權、考量被告應否以及如何擔責」三個步驟來查明和處理實體問題。文章透過總結法官裁判互聯網不正當競爭案件的經驗，並採用理論聯繫實踐的方法，舉出鮮活案例，對裁判互聯網不正當競爭案件的程序問題和實體問題（三部曲），進行深入淺出的分析。

Mastering the judgment method of internet unfair competition cases is crucial for the judge to accurately judge the unfair competition cases and the party to a case to win the lawsuit.Judging substantive facts of the Internet unfair competition case should follow the “trilogy” method, in others words judges shall identify and handle entity problems in three steps when hearing a case about internet unfair competition, that is: “Finding out whether the plaintiff has the rights or not, Identifying whether the defendant constitutes infringement or not, Considering whether the defendant should bear responsibility or not and how”. This article aims to through summarizing the experience of judges’ unfair competition cases and using the method of combining theory with practice to citing fresh cases to analysis the procedural and substantive issues (“Ttrilogy” Method) of the internet unfair competition cases.