月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
新竹教育大學教育學報 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
大學生專題報告Rubrics之發展與成效評估:以人力資源管理相關課程為例
並列篇名
Development and Evaluation of Rubrics for Assessing the Performance of College Students in Human Resource Management Courses
作者 柳玉清
中文摘要
研究者採用 Rubrics,分別發展人力資源管理課程的書面報告大綱和口頭專題報告之評分規準。研究參與對象為研究者任教課程之51位大學生,分成十組。結果發現:在二位教師之間、以及教師與學生之間的評分者間信度頗高,而且評分標準越具體、可量化,評分的信度相對提高。雖然以 Rubrics 評分的相關係數略高於傳統評分方式,只是此差異極為微小。問卷調查顯示:學生對於 Rubrics 評量方法傾向認同與肯定,學生也願意接受同學之間的互評。本研究整理研究發現以及學生意見,提出對於未來研究與使用 Rubrics 的具體建議。
英文摘要
Two sets of rubrics were developed for assessing the performance of students in Human Resource Management courses. The rubrics were reviewed by 3 experts and discussed with students in class. The final versions of the rubrics were used for assessing students’ performance. In addition, a questionnaire was designed to obtain students’ opinions on using the rubrics for assessment. The participants were 2 college professors and 51 college students. They were divided into 10 groups. The results showed high interrater reliability among the professors’ scores, as well as between the professors’ and students’ scores; interrater reliability results were higher when the criteria were concrete and quantifiable. Despite the use of rubrics resulting in slightly higher interrater consistency than the use of traditional grading methods did, the differences were negligible. However, the intrarater correlations (scores graded using 2 methods by the same person) were higher than the interrater correlations (scores graded using the rubric method by different people). The results from the questionnaire revealed that the students had positive attitudes toward the uses of rubrics for classroom assessment and peer assessment. On the basis of these findings, I offer specific recommendations for future studies of the application of rubrics to classroom assessment.
起訖頁 077-108
關鍵詞 評分規準學習成果評量實作評量信度Rubricslearning outcome assessmentperformance assessmentreliability
刊名 新竹教育大學教育學報  
期數 201606 (33:1期)
出版單位 清華大學竹師教育學院(原:新竹教育大學)
DOI 10.3966/199679772016063301003   複製DOI
QRCode
該期刊-上一篇 應用決策樹分析視導人員專業能力與學校視導績效之關係
該期刊-下一篇 整合式課程設計:關鍵學習落實在心理統計學課程
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄