英文摘要 |
Two sets of rubrics were developed for assessing the performance of students in Human Resource Management courses. The rubrics were reviewed by 3 experts and discussed with students in class. The final versions of the rubrics were used for assessing students’ performance. In addition, a questionnaire was designed to obtain students’ opinions on using the rubrics for assessment. The participants were 2 college professors and 51 college students. They were divided into 10 groups. The results showed high interrater reliability among the professors’ scores, as well as between the professors’ and students’ scores; interrater reliability results were higher when the criteria were concrete and quantifiable. Despite the use of rubrics resulting in slightly higher interrater consistency than the use of traditional grading methods did, the differences were negligible. However, the intrarater correlations (scores graded using 2 methods by the same person) were higher than the interrater correlations (scores graded using the rubric method by different people). The results from the questionnaire revealed that the students had positive attitudes toward the uses of rubrics for classroom assessment and peer assessment. On the basis of these findings, I offer specific recommendations for future studies of the application of rubrics to classroom assessment. |