物權行為立法主義之研析──兼評吉林省長春市中級人民法院（2014）長民再字第00012號判決

A Study of Property Law Conduct Theories: An analysis of the 2014 Jilin Province Changchun City Intermediate People’s Court Civil Case No: 00012 Decision

本文係就2014年4月23日吉林省長春市中級人民法院（2014）長民再字第00012號「郭○紅、張○國與韓○奪所有權確認再審民事判決」，研析其在程序面及實體面所涉之重要民事法律問題。程序面，包括當事人適格判斷標準建制、細緻共同訴訟之類型、提起再審主體之省思；實體面，側重物權行為理論之探討，並借鑑各主要大陸法系國家之立法例及歐洲示範民法典草案之相關規定，冀對本案判決及相關問題有多元之視角與思維。

This paper analyzes the legal issues and procedural aspects of the civil case, “The Civil Ruling on the Affirmation of Ownership in the case of Kuo, Zheng, and Han” (Civil Case No: 00012), decided on April 23, 2014 by the Jilin Province Changchun City Intermediate People’s Court. The procedural analysis of this case discusses the establishment of the litigating party’s standing standards, categories of joint litigants, and a review of issues subject to retrial. The legal analysis of this case discusses property law conduct theories by referencing the Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR) for European Private Law and other civil law countries’ legislative examples in effort to provide different perspectives to this case.