This research is bring up the reflection on Grand Justice Interpretation No. 699 and related comment, the author considers that refused to take the sobriety test is refused to offer the information of internal alcohol concentration just as offer the information drug components by urine test, both of situations are part of information privacy. Furthermore, the driver’s blood alcohol concentration concerns with disable from driving safely of Criminal Code and violating Road Traffic Management Penalities Regulation. The former is indispensable evidence which is legitimacy, the latter is belongs to administrative execution. Then expounds the force immediately is equal to abbreviated procedure by the hypothetically basic instruction, and advocates should force directly taking the sobriety test. In conclusion proposes some suggestions to amending the Law.