英文摘要 |
The capital system of Taiwan’s Company Act has existed in name only due to the weird concept of paid-in capital and the permission to return additional paid-in capital in excess of par to shareholders without any restrictions. The causes of this problem are the “par value stock system” and the long practice of NTD.10 per share. The author doesn’t insist or argue that our Company Act should stick to capital system; however, the Act should emphasize the functions of this system since it can protect creditors and shareholders. The Company Act’s newly- added Section 13, “Close Company”, permits the issuing of no par value shares, which facilitated the reflections of par value stock system and expectations that the no par value shares system can one day apply to all types of companies limited by shares. |