月旦知識庫
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫學   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   非核心 DOI文章
查看詳細全文
篇名
論公開發行股票公司變更章程召集事由之揭露義務及違反效果
並列篇名
The Information Disclosure Transparency of Convening for Alteration of Public Offering Companies’ Articles of Incorporation and the Annulment of the Resolution in the Shareholders’ Meeting
作者 李俊霖
中文摘要

公開發行股票公司藉由公開發行向市場募集資金,應賦予其更高程度之股東會資訊揭露義務,避免董事會操縱通知及公告之召集事由記載內容,利用資訊不對稱,影響股東決定是否親自出席、如何行使表決權。在現行法制下,過去數十年來對於公開發行股票公司變更章程召集事由載明義務程度之要求,以及對於「臨時動議」與「修正案」概念之解釋,均應有所檢討,始符現代公司法思維下之法律秩序,以達保障股東權益之目的。

 

英文摘要
“The Information Disclosure Transparency” is a top issue of the modern corporation governance principle discussed in OECD, United Nations, the United States of America, Germany, and etc., especially for public offering companies with increased regulatory scrutiny and less control for majority owners and company founders. With the amendment of Taiwan’s “Company Act” section 28, 172-1, 177-1, 177-2, 177-3 and the promulgation of“Regulations Governing Content and Compliance Requirement for Shareholders’ Meeting Agenda Handbooks of Public Companies,” the foundation of reliance upon which shareholders had placed in the past decades to determine whether or not and how to exercise their voting powers, for example, attending the meeting in person, in writing or by way of electronic transmission, appointing a proxy to attend the meeting, has been altered. The new foundation as well as “Securities and Exchange Act” section 25-1 and “Regulations Governing the Use of Proxies for Attendance at Shareholder Meetings of Public Companies” explicitly impose an obligation on public companies to disclose the specific articles scheduled to amend, instead of merely sending convening notice subject to Company Act section 172 paragraph 5, with which the incumbent directors used to take advantage of asymmetric information to preserve their interests. Therefore, the pertinent judicial opinions about the obligation of disclosure and the construction of “extemporary motion” and “amended proposal” should be reviewed under the principle of protecting shareholders’ rights to be in accordance with the purpose of legal framework in modern society. The violation of the obligation of disclosure may render the resolution of amendment to articles in vain, however, the discretion is still vested in the court.
起訖頁 150-171
關鍵詞 公開發行股票公司資訊揭露變更章程召集事由股東會議事手冊臨時動議撤銷股東會決議Public CompaniesInformation Disclosure TransparencyThe Alteration of the Articles of IncorporationNotice to Convene a Meeting of ShareholdersThe Shareholders’ Meeting Agenda HandbookExtemporary MotionThe Annulment of the Resolution
刊名 月旦法學雜誌  
期數 201511 (246期)
出版單位 元照出版公司
DOI 10.3966/102559312015110246009  複製DOI
QRCode
該期刊-上一篇 黨團協商、特殊立法機制與權力分立
該期刊-下一篇 美國抗生素動物用藥之管制──政策與法律觀點
 

新書閱讀



最新講座


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄