論“民意審判”與司法的主體性危機

On the 'Public Trial' and the Judicial Subjectivity Crisis

“李昌奎案”式的“順應民意”已經成為司法面對輿論關注時的一種典型的應對模式。“司法的人民性”這樣一種意識形態化的論證策略進而為此種“順應民意”提供了合法性支援。然而，通過運用大眾傳播學的分析工具即可清楚表明，在一起起萬眾矚目的個案背後推動“民意”的，並不是一貫正確、與真理同在的“人民”，而依然可能是利益、權力、偏見與謬誤。當“民意”與政治權力不恰當地結合在一起時，就會造成司法的主體性危機。

Complies with public voice in Li Chang kui cases way has become a typical problem solving mode when court faces with public opinion. And the ideologized demonstration strategy about people character of justice can make legitimacy support to this accommodation. But, by applying with analysis tools of mass communication, we can find that the guys stand behind public voice, will never be people who makes no mistake, but still be things with interests, power, prejudice and mistake. When the political power inappropriately combined with the public opinion, and will result in judicial subjectivity crisis.