月旦知識庫
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫學   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   非核心 DOI文章
查看詳細全文
篇名
對於績效考核之司法審查與解僱最後手段性原則之適用--評臺灣高等法院九十三年度勞上字第五十號民事判決
並列篇名
The Application of Judicial Review of Performance Appraisal and Ultima Ratio Grundsatz: Comments on the (93) Lao-Shang No. 1 Decision Rendered by the Taiwan High Court
作者 張義德
中文摘要
績效考核通常係由勞工之主管所為,不過由於評定標準較為抽象且進行評定時難免有一定之裁量餘地,因而在實務上迭生爭議。是以,本文乃擬先整理我國有關績效考核爭議之判決及學說見解以了解目前的問題狀況,接著再探討在日本法上對於相關問題之處理方式,最後再以此為基礎來檢視本判決之妥當性,期盼能釐清相關的問題並提供可能的解決途徑。
英文摘要
Performance appraisal is the method the employer evaluates employees job performance by various aspects such as work competencies, attitude and productivities. However, the criteria of performance appraisal tend to be abstract. Besides, the evaluator has certain authorities when conducting performance appraisal. The above two reasons could lead to the discrepancy between employer and employee. To solve the above problems, we are going to organize the current theories related to the controversy over the evaluation of performance appraisal and refer to solutions based on Japanese Labor Law, then examine the rationality of this judgment on account of the above conclusion. Hope this could get to the bottom of this issue and provide a possible solution.
起訖頁 281-306
關鍵詞 績效考核司法審查工作規則合理性變更法理解僱最後手段性原則Performance AppraisalJudicial ReviewDisadvantageous Modification of the Work Rule TheoryUltima Ratio Grundsatz
刊名 月旦法學雜誌  
期數 201506 (241期)
出版單位 元照出版公司
DOI 10.3966/102559312015060241013  複製DOI
QRCode
該期刊-上一篇 公平交易法關於廣告規範之最新發展
該期刊-下一篇 文獻新訊
 

新書閱讀



最新講座


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄