月旦知識庫
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫學   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   非核心 DOI文章
查看詳細全文
篇名
論載貨證券管轄權條款之問題
並列篇名
Study on Some Problem of Jurisdiction Clause in Bill of Lading
作者 羅俊瑋
中文摘要
國際訴訟案件管轄權之取得為對涉外民事訴訟案件審理之前提,於取得國際訴訟案件管轄權後,一國始得將案件分配於內國法院審判。海上運送因各國法律規定不同,對當事人間權益影響甚鉅,故常有擇地訴訟情形發生。又海上運送人於運送單證(如載貨證券)載有管轄權條款,此時該條款是否得以拘束當事人?就此,學說與實務之見解相當分歧。聯合國於2008年通過最新國際海上運送公約──鹿特丹規則,就此有詳細規範。故我國雖無機會簽署鹿特丹規則,但似可將鹿特丹規則作為範本,藉以供國內未來就相關規定修法之參考。
英文摘要
International jurisdiction is prerequisite for the international lawsuit case to distribute the case to the domestic court trial. Various rules in Maritime Act in different countries have great influence on both carriers and cargo owners and which might lead to the forum shopping. Also it is common to have jurisdiction clause in the maritime transport contract (i.e. B/L). Were parties bounded by the clause? The views between the theory and practice differ. UN has adopted Rotterdam Rules in 2008 and it has codified in maritime jurisdiction. Though there seemed no chance for our country to sign Rotterdam Rules as not being a member of UN, that Rotterdam Rules could be a model law for our country for further legal system reformed which will be stated in this article.
起訖頁 81-128
關鍵詞 國際裁判管轄權漢堡規則鹿特丹規則擇地訴訟合意管轄International Jurisdiction Hamburg RulesRotterdam RulesForum Shopping Concensual Jurisdiction
刊名 世新法學  
期數 201412 (8:1期)
出版單位 世新大學法學院
DOI 10.3966/199815542015010801003  複製DOI
QRCode
該期刊-上一篇 大學自治的憲法要求與其對教育行政的規範效果
該期刊-下一篇 論美國懲罰性賠償金倍數比例之趨勢
 

新書閱讀



最新講座


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄