英文摘要 |
The continuation explosion accident (nuclear power plant explosion) of the nuclear reaction equipment of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant which carried out the concurrent occurrence to the Great East Japan Earthquake (311 earthquake disasters) which occurred on March 11, 2011, and it has had big influence on Japanese society even now which has passed for one year. The whole statements which meanwhile produces and changes are called ”311 Statement” in this study. Such whole statements are huge, and always changing, so it is difficult for us to catch the feature by quantitive research. Therefore, this paper has applied the technique of the case study and chosen the editorial in 2011 of a national paper ”Yomiuri Shimbun” and ”Asahi Shimbun” which represents the press in Japan as a statement sample of established media. Moreover, a collection of criticism, ”3.11 are read” written by Matsuoka Masatake who is a critic and an editor as a statement sample of intellectual communities (the publishing, academic circles, the literary world, etc.) from which this paper is taken out as a turning point document for 311 earthquake-disaster one year in 2012. And this paper has performed genre comparison of the keyword, after decoding the qualitative analysis, respectively. As a result, there were 311 earthquake disasters in a state or a political level and a tendency which subject concentrates on nuclear power plant explosion processing gradually as a feature of the statement structure of ”311 Statement” of both. Moreover, a common structure where the statement about the radioactive exposure problem which has most serious influence on the disaster victim of 311 earthquake disasters, or the measure against an earthquake disaster and the life of people are avoided intentionally. The tendency for 311 statements of journalism in Japan conceals the most serious radioactive exposure problem from this result. |