英文摘要 |
One of conditions of the so-called ”good writing” is the easiness to read and it largely depends on unity of writing, that is, cohesion in writing. Cohesion appears in a certain form of language, and it must be linguistically analyzed. This paper will analyze the cohesion of ”No”, ”Noda” and ”Nodatta”.First, the case particle ”NO”, as soon as it has made noun-phrase, demands the modified noun. We call it ”NP-absorbity of NO”. So NP-predicate gives more firmness and stability than VP-predicate.Next, ”NO” at the end of sentence, like ”Shatsu no botann no torechatta no”, has ”reservability of the whole situation”. This sort of ”N0” is the so-called copy word that pastes a sentence placed before ”No” and presents it. This sort of ”No” also works as a complementizer. Besides ”No”, ”Koto” works as a complementizer too. ”No” as a complementizer has ”reservability of the whole situation”, but ”Koto” has ”reservability of the summarized situation”.”Noda sentence” takes the reservability of the whole situation using the copy word ”No” (nominalization), and, adding ”Da”, makes a complete sentence. If we use cleverly ”Noda”, it will bring a considerable cohesion to writings. Therefore ”Noda” at the end of the writing gives a tension to the whole writing. Otherwise ”Nodatta” at the end of the writing, for the sake of the past-tense ”Ta”, makes readers ease the tension, as if a scene of movie is gradually fading out. Thus ”Nodatta” gives a feel of ending to writings. |