英文摘要 |
While evaluating the performance of information sharing between public organizations is a critical issue in electronic cross-boundary governance, there is still a research gap in the development of measurement instruments. It is our objective to develop several performance indicators and compare their results through two representative cases (i.e., the Commerce Industrial Service Portal and the eTax Portal ). We conducted a secondary data research using the data collected from the perspectives of internal system users. On the one hand, this research focused on the similarity of two kinds of subjective performance indicators (i.e., attitudinal measures indicator and factual measures indicator) in terms of the indicators’ variances within each item on the results of content validity, construct validity and reliability. On the other hand, this research examined the relationships between the subjective performance indicators and other variables in terms of their criterion-related validity, an area of study which is seldom mentioned in the current literature. Based on the existing data, we found that attitudinal measure indicators are more delicate and stable than factual measure indicators for most of the estimations. Accordingly, we suggest that further study should give priority to attitudinal measure indicators for evaluating the performance of information sharing between different organizations. |