從論點、論證與邏輯形式談〈幸福何在〉與〈注意差距〉兩篇散文

The Study on Arguments, Evidences and Logical Forms between ''Where Is Happiness''and''Note the Gap'' Abstract

本文從論點、論證與邏輯形式討論兩篇議論文：〈幸福何在〉與〈注意差距〉，它們分別是現代散文名家思果與王鼎鈞的作品。研究發現，〈幸福何在〉的核心論點是知足，次要論點為知己與無己；它用了相當多的事例來佐證論點，使之更有說服力，論述與例證交互出現，增加了文章的可讀性。在邏輯推理上，運用逐層擴展法與演繹法來鋪述文章。〈注意差距〉平行陳列四則小故事，每則故事都緊扣「差距」的唯一論點，所舉的故事深具代表性，作品的邏輯推理有條不紊，分析事理清晰透澈，可以說是用小故事來比方說明大道理的歸納性議論文。

My study on Arguments, evidences and logical forms of two argumentative proses ﹕ ''Where Is Happiness''and''Note the Gap''.The two proses are Siguo's and Wang Ding Jun's . The study finds that the core argument of ''Where is Happiness'' is contentment, and the secondary argument is to understand yourself and selflessness. It uses many examples to corroborate the arguments and make the article more convincing. Then statementsinteract with the examples. In the logical forms, the article uses a layer-by-layer expansion method and a deductive method. Another essay of ''Note the Gap'' displays four small stories, each of which is tied to the sole argument of the ''gap''. The stories in the article are very representative and the logical reasoning of the work is organized. ''Note the Gap'' uses four short stories to illustrate and inductive reason argumentative theories.