霍穆斯比較教育問題解決法之剖析

Interpretation the Brian Holmes' Problem-Solving Method in Comparative Education

比較教育方法論為進行比較教育結果優劣的關鍵，霍穆斯（Brian Holmes）首創比較教育問題解決法影響比較教育甚鉅。本文旨在運用文獻分析法，首先，以詮釋霍穆斯比較教育問題解決法的五步驟（問題的選擇與分析、政策提案的擬訂、相關因素的確認、預測政策所可能產生的結果，以及比較邏輯預測的結果與可能觀察到的事件）為基礎，先解析問題解決法的五步驟，重新詮釋並試著提出問題解決方法論架構。其次，比較霍穆斯與金恩比較教育方法論，探討一體兩面的內涵及其兩者差異。最後，提出霍穆斯比較教育問題解決法在大數據時代的三點建議，即「以資料分類四模式來蒐集」、「分析大數據資料」、「運用更科學方法蒐集更正確資料」、「善用教育問題解決方法論架構輔以大數據來解決教育問題」。

The methodology of comparative education 1s the key to the results of comparative education. Brian Holmes first puts forward the method of problem-solving in comparative education, which has a significant influence on comparative education. This paper main lyuses the method of literature analysis to explain the five processes of the method of problem-solving in Comparative Education proposed by Holmes (including: the identification and analysis of problems, the classification of educational data and in format ion, the establishment of ideal-typical normative models, the analysis and comparison of the ways in which policies are formulated, adopted and implemented, the prediction of the outcomes of adopted plan or of possible outcomes of proposed policies). Firs to fall, reinterpret and try to put forward the model framework of the problem-solving approach. Secondly, compare the comparative education approach put forward by Brian Holmes and Edmund King to discuss the connotation of integration and two sides and the differences between them. Finally, put forward the suggestions of Holmes' comparative education problem-solving approach in today's big data era, including: strengthen the feedback function of 'five processes' of problem-solving approach, and adopt the form of ' multiple classification' according to the particularity of data, instead of being limited to 'four models'; make good use of repeated experiments and predictions to seek the most suitable educational innovation policies. In this paper, we try to put forward a perfect point of view on Holmes' comparative education problem-solving method, hoping to arouse more researchers of comparative education to continue to improve this method.