英文摘要 |
From its earliest beginnings of their ancestor Ji Zhao, who lived as an official under the command of Cao Cao, the Ji family had been partial to Confucian thinking. Ji Kang had two brothers, the eldest who died before Ji Kang, the other, Ji Xi, who served prominently in officialdom. Why did Ji Xi, whose attitude towards bureaucracy and living in seclusion had been completely different from that of Ji Kang, write “The Biography of Ji Kang”? How is it that this biography emphasizes Ji Kang's talent, ambition and integrity and his tendency toward Taoism? One might argue that it is because Ji Xi wanted to expose the cruelty of the Sima Family in killing dissidents and to express his disapproval of Ji Kang's death. This article first focuses on Ji Kang and Ji Xi's different attitudes toward officialdom and seclusion by examining the poems they gave each other and their efforts to pave the way of officialdom for their descendants. Then, this article analyzes Ji Xi's intention to write “The Biography of Ji Kang” and investigate how Jia Xi's, as an official, wished to correct the drawbacks of people who commend seclusion but belittle officialdom. Through the poems of correspondence by these two brothers, we can perceive a sense of historicity, which involves hidden commentary on people and politics. Thus, Ji Xi's image is improved; Chi Kang's character and scholarship are highlighted, to then exemplify the disillusionment and pain of Wei-Jin scholars who “serve” but do not really wish to serve, and who “retreat” but do not truly wish to live in seclusion. |