我自做我之《金瓶梅》──張竹坡批評《金瓶梅》的演義思維

My Golden Lotus: The Yan Yi Thinking in Zhang Zhu Po's Criticism Jin Ping Mei

明代中葉以降，通俗小說批評伴隨通俗小說創作之流行，不斷體現在各家筆記散論、作品序跋和實際評點之上，共同形塑了明清小說學的諸多理論面向。張竹坡批評《金瓶梅》一書，不僅接受了馮夢龍以降有關「四大奇書」的評價看法，更是踵繼金聖歎批《水滸》而有所發揮。尤其值得注意的是，張竹坡在批評文字中明確提及「我自做我之《金瓶梅》，我何暇與人批《金瓶梅》也哉」和「使人一覽無復有前此之《金瓶》矣」的思想主張，使得評點本身體現出強烈的演義思維。因此，本文即以張竹坡批評《金瓶梅》之評點文字為研究對象，主要研究重點有三：一是分析張竹坡對於《金瓶梅》創作屬性的認知；二是探究張竹坡批評《金瓶梅》時所展現的編創思維；三是闡述張竹坡批評《金瓶梅》的所寄寓的世勸思想。經由上述研究，期能解決以往研究有關苦孝說、吳月娘罪人說、孟玉樓為作者自喻說的不解之處，同時也為來日進一步分析其評點作法提供必要的思想基礎。

Since the Mid-Ming Dynasty, criticism of popular novels had frequently appeared in notes, prefaces, postscripts and actual comments (Ping Dian). Zhang Zhu Po criticized Jin Ping Mei (The Golden Lotus) not only followed general assessments of ＂The Four Masterpieces＂ since Feng Meng Long, but also developed a new standpoint based on Jin Sheng Tan criticism ideas. In his criticism book Jin Ping Mei, he stated: ＂I write my own criticism of Jin Ping Mei which has nothing to do with others' criticism of it.＂ He also indicated that his criticism was unprecedented and this made his comments (Ping Dian) full of creation consciousness. This paper focuses on Zhang Zhu Po's Jin Ping Mei creation criticism and Zhang's delineation of yanyi and analyzes the message he wanted to transmit. Through the analyzes to bring new perspectives to interpret Jin Ping Mei in addition to established ones including Ku Xiao theory, blaming Wu Yue Niang theory, and referring Meng Yu Lou as the author theory.