中文摘要 |
本研究旨在探討離島治理(off-islands governance)的模式。針對臺灣治權所及的澎湖、金門及連江(通稱馬祖)三縣的治理經驗,以法制研究途徑(legal approach);復依數十年來的實地觀察(field observation)所獲致的經驗,以進行實證分析(empirical analysis)。由於澎湖儘管與金門、馬祖皆處臺灣本島的離島,但自1949年以來,即因澎湖歸屬臺灣本島所屬臺灣省之一縣,完全係依本島各縣(市)模式,以實施地方自治;而金門、馬祖則因緊臨中國大陸福建省東岸,在兩岸對峙之際,金門與馬祖係軍事基地;尤其在軍管時期,其政治生態採有異於中國大陸之各縣級離島治理機制和成就。因之,本研究係針對澎、金、馬的特殊化政經生態進行質化研究,分析上揭三離島縣之治理成就所在,並且就治理策略(governing strategy)分別探就三離島縣之差異性,藉以評析離島治理之綜效。此外,針對上揭三離島縣自2000年施行「離島建設條例」以來,在地方財政,地方文化及地方觀光之重大成就加以分析,以呈現法制觀點。由於中國大陸亦有大小不等的離島縣,其近些年經濟成就非凡,為各界人士所肯認,希望臺灣三離島縣能將治理經驗進行通盤檢視,且宜針對若干需要策進部分,再研擬改革作為,以為再設計之參考。
This paper will be written about the ruling experience for off-islands governance in Taiwan. At present Taiwan has three sites of off-islands county by ruling domain such as Penghu、Kinmen and Matsu. Because of there are different models of political and economic ecology, so they have to use multi-types for ruling local affairs. Every off-island has different governing achievement that ought to be evaluated by professional assessment. This paper will use legal approach and field observation to analyze performance for serving achievement by three sites of off-islands county. I hope to understand Taiwan off-islands experiences as according to this study. |