我國公司法臨時管理人之研究

To Research the Temporary Manager in R.O.C. Corporate Law

臨時管理人做為公司臨時、法定執行機關，以暫代董事長或董事會以積極召開股東會選任新董事成立董事會互選董事長，消極地就公司通事務行使職務，使公司得以持續運作。臨時管理人在公司治理目的上乃貫徹立法者「集團化管理」之替代，維繫公司中樞執行領導地位。我國法制上，臨時管理人實務先以民事訴訟法第532條、第538條及第535條為依據，其後於非訟事件法第65條予以明文，時勢推移，公司經營權爭奪中方興未艾，造成股東、債權人及利害關係人權益很大損害，立法機關於是修正公司法、非訟事件法，並於企業併購法制定加入，造成實體法與訴訟法適用上的交錯，本文乃試圖釐清其相互關係與適用上的關係，並比較公司法與企業併購法之差異。公司法臨時管理人規定過於簡略，造成適用上之疑慮，本文乃從其地位、職權要件逐一提出問題及看法，祈能釐清爭議，以為修法與實務適用上之參考。 The Temporary Manager as a corporate temporary legal executive institution, he (or they) should actively open the stock-holders meeting for choosing new directors to be a board of directors which choose the present of director, he also inactively perform the corporate ordinary affairs which make the corporate can proceed.The Temporary Manager in eye of corporate governance purpose is to perform and replace the legislative ”Centralized Management”. It can proceed the administrative leadership position.In our country, the judicial decision used Civil Procedure Article 532, 538 and 535 as a basis to choose temporary manager to perform the president of directors, or board of directors. The Legislative Congress amends Non-Civil Procedure in 1972 to add Article 65. In recent times, the fight for corporate control constantly which caused much detriment for the stockholders, creditors and constituencies. 2001, the legislative congress amended Corporate Law, 2002 amended Enterprise Meyer Law, 2005 amended Non-Civil Procedure. It mixed the substantial and procedure law. The article intends to make it clear about the mutual interwork and application relationship. It also compares the differences between Corporate and Enterprise Meyer Law about Temporary Manager.The regulation of Temporary Manager in Corporate Law is too briefly. It causes so many confusions. The article will discuss legal position, rights and liabilities, requirement of the Temporary Manager which may save the confusions and make as a references of amending the statutes and judicial decision.