從兩極化刑事政策論醫療暴力

Perspective of Polarized Criminal Policy for Medical Violence

近幾年醫療暴力頻傳，不僅影響醫療人員本身安全，更影響其他病人之生命安危。如果醫護人員在醫療過程中受到言語威脅，甚至人身暴力對待，不只健康或安全受到破壞，更有可能干擾醫療運作，影響了病人治療。綜觀目前醫療法之規定，有其可取之處，但卻也發生徒有其法，但未能有效壓制醫療暴力之效果。本文嘗試藉由兩極化刑事政策以觀醫療法之實質內容，從中發現現行醫療法檢討之處；另外，將逐條分析醫療法中有關醫療暴力之規定，並分析近5年（2014年1月1日至2018年6月30日）法院判決之結果，以反證本文之論點，進而就討論之結果提出建議，以有效防止醫療暴力的發生。 In recent years, medical violence has spread frequently, which not only affects the safety of medical personnel themselves, but also affects the safety of other patients. If medical personnel are threatened by speech in the medical process, or even personal violence, not only health or safety is destroyed, it is more likely to interfere with medical operations and affect patient treatment. Looking at the current provisions of the medical law, there are merits, but it fails to effectively suppress the effects of medical violence. This article attempts to examine the current medical law by examining the substance of the medical law through a polarized criminal policy. In addition, it will analyze the medical violence provisions in the medical law one by one, and analyze the results of the court decisions in the past five years (January 1, 2014 to June 30, 2018). In order to counteract the arguments of this article, we will make recommendations on the results of the discussion to effectively prevent the occurrence of medical violence.