臺灣對《南海仲裁案》的回應與其國際法意涵：新的南海政策？

Taiwan’s Response to the South China Sea Arbitration Case and Its International Law Meaning: New South China Sea Policy?

臺灣外交部在仲裁做出當晚立即表示：「仲裁庭就『南海仲裁案』做出之判斷，中華民國政府鄭重表示，完全無法接受，其結果對我國沒有任何法律拘束力」，台灣成為第一個在仲裁做出後正式表示反對的民主國家。除外交部外，臺灣的總統府與行政院同樣對此仲裁結果有所評論，此等文件雖然是針對《南海仲裁案》而發，但其間卻觸及整體南海政策問題，而在檢視此等文件後，不難發現此等文件似與先前臺灣政府有關南海的文件有所差異，此等差異對臺灣而言究有何意義？不論在法律上或對外政策上似有加以分析之需要，因此本文除第一部份引言外，將在第二部分針對臺灣所提出不接受仲裁結果之理由進行討論；而本文第三部分將根據比較此等新舊文件之差異進行討論，並論述其國際法意義；第四部分則作觀察與總結。 The arbitral tribunal has made a judgment on the South China Sea Arbitration Case, and the Government of the Republic of China solemnly expresses that it is totally unacceptable and that the results do not have any legal binding force on our country,＂ Taiwan’s first A democratic state that has been formally opposed by an arbitration. In addition to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Presidential Office of Taiwan and the Executive Yuan have also commented on the results of this arbitration. Although these documents are issued for the South China Sea Arbitration Case, but in the meantime touched on the overall policy of the South China Sea, and in the inspection of such documents, It is not difficult to find such documents like the previous Taiwan government documents related to the South China Sea differences, these differences on Taiwan, what is the significance? In addition to the legal or foreign policy seems to have to analyze the need, so this article in addition to the first part of the introduction, the second part of the Taiwan proposed non-acceptance of the reasons for the arbitration to discuss the reasons for the third part of this article will be based on Compare the differences between these old and new documents to discuss and discuss the meaning of its international law; the fourth part is observed and summarized.