中文摘要 |
清末民初學者黃節(1873-1935)對漢魏六朝詩文提出頗多見解及著述,導致一般大眾多認為黃氏係以六朝詩歌箋注為專業領域,往往忽略其在《詩經》學的撰作。黃氏的《詩經》著述有《詩旨纂辭》、《變雅》、〈《詩序》非衛宏所作說〉等篇章。然而目前針對黃節及其相關著作的討論,仍多著眼於其漢魏六朝詩歌箋注及中國歷代詩歌史等方面,目前雖已有部分針對《詩旨纂辭》的前行成果,但仍可持續探討。本文透過梳理《詩旨纂辭》及〈《詩序》非衛宏所作說〉之內容,歸納黃節治《詩》之特色,黃氏多以《序》、《傳》為尊,並以之駁朱子《詩集傳》之說。透過本文的梳理,當可明瞭黃節在《詩經》學方面的歸趨。
Huang-Jie's research in Shi-Jing called Shi-Zhi-Zuan-Ci, Bian-Ya, and “Shi-Xu-Fei-Wei-Hong-Suo-Zuo-Shuo" had less discussion than his other studies. This article generalize those writings characteristics, including the thought about the author of Shi-Xu, widely used allusion of traditional classics, using the numerous statements of Shi-Jing in Han dynasty, for instance Shi-xu and Mao-Shi-Gu-Xun-Chuan for his studies on Shi-Jing ,taking those statements to except the opinion of Shi-Ji-Chuan which written by Zhu-Xi in Song dynasty. In addition, Huang-Jie also quoted the statements of ancient scholars and arranged their statements of Shi-Jing. Through these characteristics, it could be almost understand the research of approach and the academic attribution of Huang-Jie's Shi-Jing studies. |