集體經濟組織成員身份確認的可訴性研究

儘管集體經濟組織成員身份確認的可訴性問題在理論上尚有諸多爭議，相關裁判規則也總體上呈缺位元狀態，但司法機關被動捲入此類糾紛的審查已是客觀事實。實證研究表明，大部分地方法院認可司法介入的必要性，並已在前期探索中通過對戶籍、土地等多元聯系要素的歸集權衡形成了一些共識性的司法審查原則，但相關司法實踐還存在著較明顯的不確定性和不一致性。因此，有必要先行肯定司法機關對集體經濟組織成員身份確認進行附帶審查的必要性，並整合現有的立法、政策和司法實踐，從程式和實體兩個方面為司法機關的附帶審查提供必要的規則指引，為統一司法搭建制度基礎。

The somewhat reluctant involvement of the judiciary in the review of disputes concerning collective economic organizations' membership is a fact despite various doctrinal arguments to the contrary. An analysis of the decided cases shows that most local courts agree that membership disputes fall under judicial review and some basic principles shall be adopted in the adjudicating process. However, uncertainties and inconsistencies still linger as a result of absent legal guidance. The law shall break its silence on the legality of judicial review of membership disputes and offer some basic guidelines to the courts on both procedure and substance based on an alignment of current laws, national policies and judicial practices.