| 中文摘要 |
明代詩學以復古為主流，前後七子標舉「文必秦漢、詩必盛唐」，而後有公安、竟陵的出現相互承遞修正，陸時雍處於竟陵之後，而另編《唐詩鏡》以表達自己的詩學理念。《唐詩鏡》選詩依初唐、盛唐、中唐、晚唐之四唐次序編排，與《古詩鏡》兩書合稱為《詩鏡》。卷首有〈詩鏡總論〉，摘評歷代詩人及詩作，可作為探討編者詩觀的重要線索。陸時雍大致上以「神韻」為宗，且重視詩歌「情感」的自然表現，從〈詩鏡總論〉可看出陸時雍對杜詩「作意好奇」、「苦意摹情」有所指斥，甚至在李白、杜甫與王維的評比當中，最肯定李白詩的境界，但其《唐詩鏡》所選杜詩的數量又位居第一，遙遙領先唐代其他詩人，此種矛盾的現象其真正的用意為何？對杜甫的詩歌成就又是如何看待？本文試從陸時雍的詩學思想、編選詩人與作品的數量等面向分析之。
The distinguish characteristic of the poetry of Ming Dynasty is to revive the ancient poetry. The Qianhouqizi School advocates “one who writes article should imitate the features of Qin and Han Dynasty; one who composes poem should follow the rule of Tang Dynasty”. Later the rise of the Gong An School and Jingling School inherited and revises the spirit of the Qianhouqizi School. Lu, Shin-Yung appears after the Jingling School and composes “The Mirror of Tang-Style Poetry”(Tang-Shin-Ching) in order to express his poetry theory. The Mirror of Tang-Style Poetry”(Tang-Shin-Ching) is composed by the order of Four Tang; moreover, it is called “Mirror of Poetry” (Shih-Ching) along with “Mirror of Ancient-Style Poetry” (Ku-Shih-Ching). The first chapter of it is “the General Discussion of Mirror of Poetry”, which makes the criticism of poet and poem in different generation and could be a clue for composer's point of view. Lu, Shin-Yung lays stress on “appearance” and “emotion” of each poem. From the “General Discussion of Mirror of Poetry”, it could be seen that Lu, Shin-Yung criticizes for Du Fu's poem in terms of his mysterious and sorrowful theme ; furthermore, in criticism of Lee Bai, Du Fu, and Wang Wei, he greatly approves the poem of Lee Bai. However, in the Mirror of Tang-Style Poetry”(Tang-Shin-Ching), Lu, Shin-Yung chooses most of Du Fu's poem. What is the reason for this confusing phenomenon? How does Lu, Shin-Yung comment for the accomplishment of Du Fu's poetry? This research tries to analyze from these aspects: the idea of poetry and the number of compilation of poet as well as poem of Lu, Shin-Yung. |
本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
