中文摘要 |
《欽定四庫全書總目》作為集諸家之大成的重要著作,實為叩問乾嘉學術思潮的門戶。《總目‧史部》在以史為鑑、從古開新的立場論述史料得失時,不可避免地利用義例和評析等編纂形式來傳達、解讀史義。本文在概述當代四庫學的相關研究後,以「編撰者歸屬」此一議題入手,指出《總目》係以紀昀為首的四庫館臣集體著作,而清高宗的觀點則是影響其編纂取向的重要關鍵。其次分別就《總目》的分類結構和提要內容來概觀史料的分類、評騭和當時學術傾向間的關聯。最後總結此種結合帝王觀點和儒臣理念的作品反映出何種史家意識。
As a largest catalog, Qinding Siku Quanshu Zongmu, which is a work that consists of many eminent scholars’ review and annotations in Qing dynasty, is considered as an important item of surveying the academic realm of the Qianlong reign. The History branch especially reflects how the editorship evaluated the historic materials. This article is divided into 5 sections. After giving a brief overview of the current relevant studies of Siku Quanshu Zongmu, the focus of discussion turns to the attribution of editor. The argument is that although Siku Quanshu Zongmu compiled by the chief editorship Ji-Yun and other, the influence of the emperor shouldn't be neglected. In order to survey the connection between the Siku Quanshu Zongmu and the academic, the paper proceeds the topic by analyzing its structure and content. The last part sums up the historian consciousness as reflected in the History Branch of Qinding Siku Quanshu Zongmu. |