「返體全用」與「因用明體」——熊十力《體用論》及其《新唯識論》思想異同之解讀

｀Fan Ti cyuan yung’And‘Yin Yung Ming Ti’ – To understand similarities and differences between Hsiung Shih-li's' The Discusses of Ti-yung ' and 'NewMere-Consciousness '

本文旨在對熊十力《體用論》及其與《新唯識論》異同比較，進而解讀為何有「新論宜廢」的觀點，但本文不採一般哲學研究對其兩論內容作詮釋與評價，本文僅在透過對熊十力先生兩論成書其間學思行年的探究，以闡明何有言「新論宜廢」的價值判準。熊氏自言「與佛家唯識大體不符」作為一種文化上的解釋。故本文乃以於學術史視野下的考察。而經本文論述中考證，以為熊十力先生所謂「新論宜廢」其在文化信念上的意義大於哲學史著作上的意義，並以「返體全用」與「因用明體」對熊氏「體用不二」說作一釐定，在此釐定之下，乃知兩論之差異實為論述策略有所殊別。據本文考略，則《新論》為哲學史著作上的意義，則論述多具邏輯性，其詮釋多為創見。時至《體用論》，則文化意義大於哲學史著作意義，則多為承繼並將其「圓融地」說，詮釋多為「體證式」的語句。 Since modern times, about the Hsiung Shih-li(熊十力) thought research, mostly pay close attention to by the facing upward of Ti-yung philosophy ( 體用哲學) about the Hsiung, but for ' NewMere-Consciousness ' (《新唯識論》) and between ' The Discusses of Ti-yung ' (《體用論》) transition, adopt Hsiung Shih-li since said' aid Buddha for Confucianism ' (援佛入儒) scholar more with ' return to the Confucianists '(歸本大易) explanation. In addition, otherwise think it is Hsiung that is changed by its thought before and after there are Marxist philosophy. Criticize by this text of a text expound the fact, think Hsiung getting so-called ｀The NewMere-Consciousness should be abandoned＇ (新論宜廢) meaning at cultural faith their greater than philosophy history, make the meaning at Mr. Hsiung, and with' Fan Ti cyuan yung' (返體全用) with ' Yin Yung Ming Ti'(因用明體) saying it is determine to do about Hsiung ' Ti-yung are the same (' 體用不二), under determining here, ' NewMere-Consciousness ' is as the meaning on knowledge, and is different from ' The Discusses of Ti-yung ' as the meaning on culture.