日本統治時代末期の陳火泉の思想に関する考察－周金波、王昶雄の作品、思想との比較－

日治時代末期陳火泉創作與思想的相關考察──與周金波、王昶雄作品、思想之比較（Study of Literary Works and Thoughts of Chen Huoquan, a Taiwanese Writer in the Late Japanese Colonial Period, in Comparison with those of Wang Changxiong and of Zhou Jinpo）

日治時代末期，陳火泉在《文藝臺灣》上發表的中篇小説〈道〉中描寫著本島人青年陳青楠向皇民化邁進的心路歷程。戰後，小説〈道〉因為上述內容之故，而有了「皇民文學」與「抗議文學」的兩極評價。但是日治時代陳火泉除了〈道〉之外也發表了不少其他作品（含手稿）；筆者認爲僅憑小說〈道〉一作以論斷或評價陳火泉與其作品猶存疑義。近年，在日治時代台灣人自我認同的相關研究中，針對至今「抵抗與屈服」等二元論述法提出了批評，並明白指出當時期台灣人的自我認同具有多樣性與複雜性。同時也有研究學者將「皇民文學」作家的學歷、階級等問題列入研究視野下試圖深入探討「皇民文學」的真實樣態。本論文根據上述的前行研究觀點，著眼於分析陳火泉日治時代末期的作品以再深入考察其創作思維；並將考察內容與戰後同被稱為「皇民作家」之周金波與王昶雄的作品、思想進行對照分析，藉以闡明陳火泉的獨創性。 In ”The Road”, published in ”Literary Taiwan”, Chen Huoquan depicted the mental process of the protagonist Chen Qingnan's devotion to Kouminka movement, or Japanese assimilation policy in its colonial period in Taiwan. Owing to its controversy, ”The Road” has been reviewed differently in the fields of Koumin Literature and Protest Literature. However, it is disputable to evaluate Chen only by ”The Road” since he published many other works (including manuscripts) in his lifetime. Criticisms have recently been proposed against dualism such as ”resistance and surrender” among studies on self identity of Taiwanese in Japanese colonial period, indicating self identity of modern Taiwanese is multidimensional and complicated. In addition, education and social status of writers of Koumin Literature have been considered in more detailed exploration of Koumin Literature. Based on the above-mentioned idea, this study aims to analyze in depth Chen's thoughts and works in the late Japanese colonial period and explore Chen's originality by comparing his works with those of Wang Changxiong and of Zhou Jinpo.