羽球賽事與場地空間－－以新北市國民運動中心為例

Badminton tournament and court space – An exploration of New Taipei City civil sports centers

背景：休閒運動風氣增加，提升國人參與休閒運動意願，生活品質提升，帶動民眾前往更優質的運動場所。針對場地與空間的規劃，使用者會因不同立場對周邊環境產生不同用途。方法：以文獻分析並綜整方式，了解目前我國新北市已辦理縣市層級以上國民運動中心，羽球場地空間規劃之情形。結果：場地空間規劃與賽事層級相關，不同層級競賽場地規劃設計不同，羽球項目研究多數以技術、賽制相關議題為主，針對賽事與空間研究較少。結論：國民運動中心場地空間規劃多以推廣性質為主，可辦理國內賽事以有觀眾席及安全緩衝區較佳。未來可進行縱貫式調查，以了解使用者真實感受，其相關建議，提供新北市各國民運動中心或其他場館辦理相關競賽經驗參考之依據。 Background: In accordance with the growth of leisure sports, which increases people’s willingness to engage in physical exercise as well as increases their quality of life, citizens are more likely to utilize better sport venues. Venue users, such as athletes, coaches, and referees, have different needs and perspectives towards their surrounding environment based on their positions (Sports facility standards, 2012). Methods: A review of the literature from badminton-related research issues in recent years attempts to clarify current space planning of badminton courts in the civil sports centers which above county level in New Taipei City classified by badminton competition level. Results: The design of the venue is related to the level of competition. There are different tournaments. For badminton, most of the research are focused on the players’ techniques and competition system. There are not too many research about the tournament and venue design. Conclusion: The badminton competition held in civil sports center were mostly in promoting purposes. Space with audience seating area and buffer zone is more appropriate for athletic competitions. Longitudinal research is suggested, with interviews of users with various positions in sports facilities to understand their perception and situation, which can be a substantial reference for sports facility operators to hold competitions in New Taipei City civil sports centers.

Background: In accordance with the growth of leisure sports, which increases people’s willingness to engage in physical exercise as well as increases their quality of life, citizens are more likely to utilize better sport venues. Venue users, such as athletes, coaches, and referees, have different needs and perspectives towards their surrounding environment based on their positions (Sports facility standards, 2012). Methods: A review of the literature from badminton-related research issues in recent years attempts to clarify current space planning of badminton courts in the civil sports centers which above county level in New Taipei City classified by badminton competition level. Results: The design of the venue is related to the level of competition. There are different tournaments. For badminton, most of the research are focused on the players’ techniques and competition system. There are not too many research about the tournament and venue design. Conclusion: The badminton competition held in civil sports center were mostly in promoting purposes. Space with audience seating area and buffer zone is more appropriate for athletic competitions. Longitudinal research is suggested, with interviews of users with various positions in sports facilities to understand their perception and situation, which can be a substantial reference for sports facility operators to hold competitions in New Taipei City civil sports centers.