不適任教師之處理流程與成績考核問題探析

The Study of the Process of Managing Incompetent Teacher and the Problem of Performance Evaluation of Teacher

教育部統計自96-100學年度解聘教師人數有170人、停聘40人、不續聘64人；近年因「教學不力」被解聘之教師人數，自101-105學年度分別有22人、20人、19人、9人及13人。不適任教師之考績辦理方式之相關法規，有「教師法」、「教育人員任用條例」及「公立高級中等以下學校教師成績考核辦法」，因教師評審委員會及教師成績考核會之組成成員及規定與權責不同，對於教師之有關不適任行為之處理，亦會造成競合，因此，本文從現行法規內容進行探討，從不適任教師處理流程、教師成績考核規定，以及不適任教師處理流程與成績考核法規條文競合之處分析，提出以下對於不適任教師之處理的兩項建議：由調查小組於調查不適任教師情勢後，先決定送考績會或進入不適任教師輔導流程；落實教師成績考核，推動教學客觀評價制度。

According to the statistics of the Ministry of Education， the number of teachers dismissed from 2007-2011 is 170， 40 are suspended， and 64 are not renewed. In recent years， the number of teachers who have been dismissed due to “ineffective teaching” in 2012-2016 are 22， 20， 19， 9 and 13. The relevant laws and regulations governing the way in which the teachers are not suitable for performance appraisal include the “Teacher Law”， “the Education Staff Appointment Ordinance” and the “Measures for Assessing the Achievements of Teachers in Public Higher Secondary Schools and Below Grade Schools”， because of the differences in the composition of members and requirements of the teacher evaluation committee and the teacher performance evaluation committee， the handling of relevant disservices by teachers will also result in competition. Therefore， this article explores the content of the current regulations， from the process of managing incompetent teacher， the performance evaluation regulations of teacher， and the disagreement between the process of managing incompetent teacher and the performance evaluation regulations of teacher. Finally， the study conclude of the following two suggestions for incompetent teacher. First， after the investigation team dissatisfied with the situation of the teacher， it is decided to send the performance appraisal meeting or enter the incompetent teacher counseling process; implement the teacher performance evaluation and promote the objective evaluation system of teaching.