月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
法制史研究:中國法制史學會會刊 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
雞姦為何為姦?──清代雞姦罪立法演變及其特殊性(1740-1911)
並列篇名
Why and How jijian Became a Sex Crime under the Qing: The Particularity of Its Criminalization and Sexualization in the Legislation (1740-1911)
作者 張寧
中文摘要
大量的研究表明中國是一個具有漫長的有關男子同性情感關係記錄的國家。有論者認為「漢代之後,男風時盛時衰。在漫長的歷史中,中國的男性在履行成家立業,傳接香火的責任之後,周圍人對他們的同性戀情往往寬而待之」。1的確,在同樣漫長的立法史中,中國一直沒有專門針對同性性關係的立法,直到清代出現雞姦罪的系列立法並開始懲治和姦性質的雞姦犯罪時,才將此寬鬆立法史改寫。雞姦罪的確是清代立法者的發明,作為法定罪名,它始於清朝也止於清朝,歷時230年。到目前為止的多數研究者認為該立法是針對同性戀的刑事立法,未能說明清朝男風盛行與雞姦罪的刑事政策的矛盾。本文擬在已有的研究成果基礎上,進一步釐清雞姦罪的性質。文章將分三部分,第一部分考察雞姦罪在中國立法者對姦罪認定的傳統認知邏輯中的例外特徵;第二部分討論清朝立法者將雞姦納入姦罪的不確定性或者說認知矛盾。第三部分結合清朝雞姦罪案例的分析以求明晰雞姦立法所針對的真正懲治對象,最終達到澄清目前研究領域中存在的誤區。
英文摘要
Numerous studies have shown that China is a country with a long tradition of documenting male homosexual relationships. Some research also posited that after the Han dynasty traditional Chinese society was more or less tolerant with homosexuality as long as men performed their duty of lineage perpetuation. In fact, China did not have any specific law addressing “homosexual relations” until the Qing Dynasty where a provision was promulgated to punish anal intercourse (jijian) essentially committed between males. Such a law has been understood as a legal stigmatization of “homosexuality” by most scholars who studied the subject. In this paper, the author argues that the real issue was not homosexuality but the punishment of offenses and crimes related to anal intercourse. The argument is unpacked in three sections. The first part attempts to describe the logic underlying sex crimes legislation before the Qing in order to highlight that, legally, male intercourses had never been considered illicit or sexual. The second part analyzes the contingency and paradoxes of the assimilation of anal intercourses to the category of sex crimes under the Qianlong reign. Finally, the third section focuses on specific cases and discusses major legislative flaws of the law as well as its problematic impact. The argument is based on the existence of a large number of homicide cases linked to self-defense against anal rape and on the quasi-absence of consented jijian cases.
起訖頁 113-173
關鍵詞 清朝雞姦罪立法雞姦姦罪性侵犯身體侵犯Qing legislation on jijian crimejijiansex crimebody assaultsexual offense
刊名 法制史研究:中國法制史學會會刊  
期數 201806 (33期)
出版單位 中國法制史學會;中央研究院歷史語言研究所
該期刊-上一篇 《明律》縱囚條文規範與社會現象──兼論「縱囚論」的議論與反思
該期刊-下一篇 清代中央繫獄諸神考
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄