完善我國智慧財產權侵權訴訟域外管轄權的若干思考

Some Considerations on the Improvement of Extraterrtorial Jurisdiction in Intellectual Property Infringement Litigation

我國對涉外智慧財產權侵權案件的管轄遵循地域性管轄原則，但該原則在實踐中日益顯示出其弊端，導致我國法院在管轄權行使問題上缺乏彈性應對能力，不利於增強我國在國際競爭中的智慧財產權競爭力。建設創新型國家要求我國法院借鑒美國等國家做法，適度擴張對涉外智慧財產權案件的管轄權。本文嘗試提出我國法院在審理不同類型涉外智慧財產權案件時突破地域性管轄的司法管轄規則，並對“平行訴訟”及“不方便法院原則”的司法適用進行了探討。

In China, intellectual property infringement litigations follow the principle of territoriality which presents gradual1y its limits in practice. In fact, it makes that our courts lack of flexibi1ity in exercising its jurisdiction, which is not beneficial for national intellectual property competitiveness in the international competition. The purpose of constructing innovative state necessitates that our courts to learn from other countries as the United States and to extend national jurisdiction in dealing with intellectual property cases involving an extraterritorial element. This article proposes some rules of jurisdiction that can bypass the principle of territoriality, and also discuss the application of 'parallel proceedings' and 'Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniences'.