中文摘要 |
Currently, the Immigration and Naturalization Act (INA) allows "spouses" of the United States citizens and permanent residents to live in the United States with their alien husbands and wives. In addition, the INA allows spouses and children who are "not otherwise entitled to an immigrant status" and are "accompanying or following to join" their spouses or parents, the same status as such spouse or parent. In other words, if a United States citizen or permanent resident marries a foreign spouse, he or she can sponsor the foreign spouse for an immigrant visa. The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) defines marriage when used in the context of federal law as only between a man and a woman. In other words, the definition of spouse does not apply to same-sex couples. Even in those states where legally recognized marriage-like status like the civil union in Vermont, the definition of spouse still does not apply to same sex couples because immigration issues are federal level and not governed by the state law. Furthermore, the United States Congress enacted several categories in immigration law such as non-immigrants visas categories: F visa for students and B visa for foreign visitors to come to the US. However, the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) exclusion in immigration law contradicts the Congress’ good intention. In other words, immigrants inflicted with HIV may face deportation. The objective of this paper is to reduce the negative impact of that the United States immigration law through research. This paper will give an overview of the immigration law regarding legal issues, and advocate for changes of the provisions that have a negative impact on immigrants. |